D&D January Conference Call

January 28th, 2008

D&D Executive Conference Call Minutes

January 22, 2008

1:30 pm (EST)

Conference update:

Planning of the 2008 conference is underway.

Planners have set aside Thursday for the D&D PacifiCorp competition and the D&D Showcase. The schedule is as follows: PacifiCorp competition student presentations from 10 am–12 pm, D&D Membership Lunch and Awards Ceremony from 121 pm and the D&D Showcase from 15 pm. This will provide an opportunity to promote the showcase at the lunch thus increasing attendance.

Conference planners have created a new event for Wednesday night (6-8 pm) for divisions to promote themselves and their work. The event will be similar to the university receptions and will coincide with the usual Roundup.

Each division will have a table. It was agreed to have the yellow TShirts from the previous year available for purchase (if financially feasible) and an LCD projector giving information about the division. We will ask for volunteers to man the booth.

MJ Bishop will be responsible for creating the PowerPoint information to be projected.

Because there is no provision in the regular conference submission for D&D Showcase proposals, parties will send their proposals directly to Ikeson Choi (ichoi@uga.edu). Ike has been asked to prepare a specific call for Showcase proposals and Amy Adcock will forward the call to the membership. Ike will also be asked to submit a proposal for the Showcase Event to the regular proposal submission system so that the event will appear in the program.

A discussion about awards for D&D Showcase participants resulted in the agreement that the award for the Practice proposal and the Showcase are too similar. Therefore, Showcase participants will receive a certificate of acceptance but there will be no judging. There will be a slot in the Showcase for the Practice Award recipient.

Four proposals have been submitted to D&D at the time of this call. There were two proposals for 90 minute sessions that would be of interest to the general membership. Monica Tracey will contact Mary Herring about the possibility of a Presidential Session sponsored by D&D.

Amy Adcock will send another reminder to the membership to submit proposals. Dates and relevant urls will be included

Communications update:

The blog and listserv are up to date. Changes to the look of the blog will be coming

Election Update:

D&D has a full slate of officers. Elections will be held until March 1, 2008

An email was sent to the membership to remind them to vote.
 

Call for Proposals: 2008 Design and Development Showcase

January 25th, 2008

Please see the .pdf for information on the 2008 D&D Showcase. Inquiries should be directed to Ikeson Choi at ichoi@uga.edu

D&D Showcase Call for Proposals

2008 D&D Proposal Guidelines

January 10th, 2008

Proposal Evaluation Guidelines

Click the link above for a copy of the 2008 proposal guidelines for Design & Development. Notice that we have three areas of focus; research, practice and theory. Proposal submissions are due on February 16, 2008. We’re looking forward to some interesting submissions. 
Best of luck!

Please fill out the convention feedback survey!

November 17th, 2007

If you attended the 2007 convention and would like to give AECT your feedback, please take just a few minutes and fill out the convention feedback survey. The survey will be live until November 30th.

D&D October Board Meeting Minutes

October 2nd, 2007

Minutes from D&D Exec Conference Call
October 1, 2007, 12:00 Noon (Eastern Time)

1. Update on conference program:
a.Tiffany reported that, due to sessions being moved, there are conflicts with facilitators.
b.At this point conflicts will be emailed to Nate.
c.On October 15, 2007, Tiffany will send a message to the membership to remind them to review the program and check for changed session days/times. Monica will post the message.

2.Fall Division Report:
a.Review of the fall division report from the division to AECT board incurred.
b.A few, minor changes were made to the report. MJ will revise and send to Ward. This will also be posted on the blog.

3.Guidelines for D&D Proposals:
a.The committee reviewed the newly created rubric of D&D Division conference proposal submission criteria. The rubric now includes practice, research, and theory/concept.
b.Elizabeth will assemble a flyer describing the types of proposals D&D is looking for to pass out to members at the conference.
c.Recruitment of reviewers for each type of proposal will occur through a sign-up sheet at the membership meeting.

4.Update on Tiffany/Monica’s conversation with Mary Herring:
a.We discussed lessons learned this year that may help us for next year.

5.Next call: We will meet at the conference on Tuesday, October 23, 2007, at 4:00.

Fall 2007 Division Report

October 1st, 2007

DIVISION SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

Name of Division: Design and Development Fall Report

Name and title of person submitting report: MJ Bishop, D&D President

Email: mj.bishop@lehigh.edu

Phone number: 610-758-3235

 

Responses to the following items may be entered directly on this form (preferred) or other paper or electronic format. This report should be submitted no later than Monday, October 8, 2007.

 

Mission:

The mission of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology is to provide international leadership by promoting scholarship and best practices in the creation, use, and management of technologies for effective teaching and learning in a wide range of settings.

 

Vision:

We seek to be the premier international organization dealing with educational technology, the organization to which others refer for best research and practices.

 

Definition:

Educational technology is the study and ethical practice of facilitating learning and improving performance by creating, using, and managing appropriate technological processes and resources.

 

Goals

  1. Advocate innovative, effective and ethical uses of educational technology.
  2. Sustain an organization of professionals who study and use technology for training and education.
  3. Establish an attractive and appealing professional presence that advances knowledge in the field.

 

Identify division goals you are addressing and when you hope to accomplish them.

 

Please relate your goals to the three main AECT goals listed above (or to strategies in the current strategic plan):

1. Advocate innovative, effective and ethical uses of educational technology.

i. Re-invigorate our awards program(s) (ongoing).

2. Sustain an organization of professionals who study and use technology for training and education.

ii. Increase active membership in the division and larger organization (ongoing).

Establish an attractive and appealing professional presence that advances knowledge in the field.

iii. Improve D&D-sponsored session quality (ongoing).

 

Describe your progress in meeting your goals in terms of specific actions you have taken or are taking:

Re-invigorate our awards program(s):

• Our focus this year has been on finding a new D&D Awards Committee Chair for 2007-08 (Rob Reiser will be stepping down after 25 years in the role). We are pleased to report that Elizabeth Boling has agreed to take this over.

• In addition, we have been working to improve the PacifiCorp Design Competition. Our new chair, Amy Adcock, and her committee explored new ways to generate even more interest in this competition among graduate students. This year, we had 5 teams enter the competition (up from 3 last year). Three teams have been chosen by our panel of 3 judges to move past “phase 2” and into the final “presentation round” of the competition at the conference (currently scheduled for Thursday, 10/25 from 9:30-11:30). Those teams areMelinda Sota and ChanMin Kim, Florida State UniversityMentor: Shauna BonaSteven Harmon and Sandra Valenti, Emporia State UniversityMentor: Becky CohenTravis Eschenmann and Thomas R. Jeffrey, Virginia TechMentor: David Merrill

•During our membership meeting last October, the members reiterated their interest in seeing more “practitioner” sorts of sessions/activities at the conference. To address this, we have created a new, competitive “D&D Showcase” to attract and appeal to more of the practitioners in our field. Nine presenters have been accepted into the showcase and, like the PacifiCorp Competition, judges will be on site during the conference to name an overall awardee. The D&D Showcase is currently scheduled for Wednesday, 10/24 from 8 a.m. – 12:00 noon.

 

ii. Increase active membership in the division and the larger organization:

• In an effort to have our “at large” D&D Executive Board of Directors begin playing a more active role in the division, we assigned their positions with specific tasks chairing key committees: the D&D Showcase (Atsusi Hirumi), the Marketing Committee (Krista Simons), and the AECT Advocacy Committee (Abbie Brown).

• We have continued to use leadership of the PacifiCorp Awards Competition as a “conduit” to divisional leadership. This year’s PacifiCorp Awards Chair, Amy Adcock became the division’s new VP for Communications, as has happened twice in the recent past.

• We have used opportunities such as divisional representation on the Future Minds task force as a way to encourage our membership to become more actively involved in AECT initiatives.

 

iii. Improve D&D-sponsored session quality:

• This year our conference planner, Tiffany Koszalka, paid special attention to creating good reviewer combinations… with a special eye toward matching graduate students with 2 or more faculty/industry reviewers with more experience. In our communications to the membership about reviewing, we also emphasized the need for graduate student reviewers to be closely mentored by a faculty “advisor.”

 

Describe additional special activities your division has undertaken or is planning to undertake and talk about how they address the three AECT goals (or strategies in the current strategic plan):

 

Re-invigorate our awards program(s):

• Once we have a new chair in place, work with that person to recruit the rest of the Awards Committee prior to October so that might meet sometime during the conference and brainstorm ideas for re-invigorating the program.

• Depending upon the level of interest and success of the D&D Showcase this year, next year we would like to further hone the “process” for this competition and would like to propose that, like the “Featured Research” sessions it might be elevated to a “Featured Practice” status on the conference program.

ii. Increase active membership in the division:

• We plan to begin working proactively to define D&D’s role and potential contributions to the larger organization and the community of deign and development practitioners.

• Continue to use opportunities like serving on the TCT Future Minds Initiative to recruit “new blood” to divisional leadership.

• Our “marketing committee” is continuing to work to get the word out about the D&D Division and the benefits of membership. This year, with the help of Elizabeth Boling’s visual design skills and CafePress, we designed and are marketing D&D T-shirts for division members to wear to the roundup as well as pins and mugs (see http://www.cafepress.com/desdevdiv/). The $1 profit that we are making on each sale will go into future D&D programming.

iii. Improve D&D-sponsored session quality:

• We are experimenting this year with shorter, themed sessions combined with a discussant… sort of like the AERA model. The idea is for presenters to have papers prepared in advance to share with the rest of the group and the discussant and for them to all coordinate at some level prior to the conference.

• We’ve noted that we’re having some problem with reviewers not understanding the differences among proposals to present research, proposals to present theory/concepts, and proposals to present practice. We are in the process of creating a flyer for this year’s conference that invites proposals in all 3 areas and makes very clear what should be included in each. In addition, we have crafted a rubric for prospective presenters and for reviewers that makes clear how to evaluate each proposal type. Proposers will be asked to indicate the proposal “type” as part of their title and reviewers will identify which proposal type they’re best suited to evaluate based on their experience/expertise.

 

How well do you feel your division is operating and meeting its goals? Please tell us why you think things are going well or less well:

While we feel we have made progress toward meeting the goals described here, there are many others we have in mind that we would like to be able to pursue… but the overly-burdensome “logistics” of divisional conference planning seems to keep us from making much additional progress. We would much prefer to focus our energies on contributing to initiatives like Future Minds and those higher-level objectives that have now been laid out by AECT’s new strategic plan. That said, if the Board is hoping the divisions will make more than just superficial contributions to those larger organizational goals, then, in our view, we must first find a way to streamline conference planning and become more efficient overall as an organization.

Do you need anything special from AECT to support your division plans? If so, please tell us what you need and when:

See above.

Are you requesting an allocation from AECT against the $500 maximum? X YES o NO

If so, how much are you requesting and please tell exactly how it would be expended:

As mentioned in our addendum to the Spring 2007 report, we will be using our $500 to pay for the plaques that the D&D Awards recipients receive.

 

Do you have any additional comments or suggestions to make? If so, please provide them here:

The D&D Executive Board was pleased to see the development of the AECT Strategic Plan and would like to be actively engaged in helping the organization meet its higher-level objectives. Please continue to consider ways in which the larger organization might involve the divisions other than relying on them solely for conference planning help and member recruitment.

Minutes from D&D Executive Board Meeting 9-11-07

September 12th, 2007

Minutes for D&D Exec Conference Call
September 11, 2007, 12:00 Noon (Eastern Time)

1.IPA Research Request: This is an IBSTPI issue. Exec will act further if/when the IBSTIPI concerns have been met. MJ will contact the requester to communicate this information to her.

On a related note regarding the listserv posting option, Monica will contact Larry to confirm which D&D Listservs are open and which ones are only available for the Communications Person to post to. She will communicate this information to the other board members.

2.AECT Strategic Plan/ Fall Division Report: In an effort to align with the AECT Strategic Plan, the D&D Division has been asked to review our goals use a new form for our fall division report that aligns with the strategic plan. The D&D Division goals currently appear to align with the plan. MJ will send the final draft to the Exec for review prior to sending on to the AECT Board.

3.Guidelines for D&D Practice Proposals: The Board reviewed of the first draft of the design practice proposal guidelines. A handout will be given at the 2007 conference for the 2008 proposals to the membership. The handout will provide clear descriptions of the three types of proposals that D&D would like to receive –research, conceptual, or practice– and guidelines for how they should be structured. Tiffany will work on the rubric, and send it to Monica who will then send it to MJ. MJ will add information on the conceptual and research proposals, then send the final document to Elizabeth who will create the handout to distribute at the conference.

4.Confirm day/time for next call: October 1, 2007 12:00Noon

Design and Development Boa5rd Meeting Minutes August 20, 2007

September 3rd, 2007

Minutes from the D&D Exec Conference Call
August 20, 2007, 4:00 (Eastern Time)

1.Honoring Bob Reiser: Bob is the recipient of the service award this year for D&D. Elizabeth is getting a plaque made, which we will ship to him since he is unable to attend AECT this year. Next year, when he can be physically present, we will honor him at the luncheon again.

2.Division Handbook template: The first of two 2007 – 2008 goals. Division board members will develop our division handbook including board positions, job descriptions; timelines for division activities etc., and share it will members.

3.Ideas from Leadership Conference:
a.Elizabeth created a D&D logo that we will have available on T-shirts, mugs and buttons for the members of the division. Elizabeth will finalize the logo and we will send the word out through the Listserv to buy a t-shirt and wear it the night of the round-up.

b.MJ will contact Sharon Smaldino about her request for a “heads up” on D&D’s special events where photos should be taken for TechTrends (D&D Luncheon, PacifiCorp Competition, Showcase).

c.MJ will email the new board members with the D&D schedule of events for the conference once they are finalized.

d.Tiffany and Monica will draft initial criteria for quality design focused proposals for the 2008 AECT conference. These criteria will be incorporated into the flyer which will be passed out at this year’s conference. Monica will work with Larry to have the criteria published for the 2008 conference call for proposals.

e.The possibility of a design journal focusing on design practice was discussed. The board will meet at the conference this fall and brainstorm ideas regarding assembling a proposal for AECT. This will be the second division 2007 – 2008 goal.

4.Tiffany gave an update regarding the conference. She has assigned facilitators, sent out the roles to them.

5.Confirm day/time for next call: September 10th is the next call 12:00noon

PacifiCorp Phase I Submissions Due May 8, 2007

May 3rd, 2007

Just a friendly reminder from the PacifiCorp Design and Development
Competition committee that phase 1 submissions are due May 8, 2007. Please
send your submissions to Dr. Amy Adcock at aadcock@odu.edu

Best of luck to our competitors,

The PacifiCorp D&D Competition Committee

Design and Development Showcase Call Dates Extended

March 1st, 2007

New in 2007: Call for Proposals
Design and Development Showcase

AECT Conference: California, Anaheim
October 24th - 27th

Invitation to Showcase Innovative Training and Educational Programs

At the 2007 AECT conference, the Design and Development Division is inviting practitioners as well as faculty and students to showcase innovative training and educational programs that are grounded in theory and research to share their work and for all conference participates to learn from and enjoy. We know that prospective and practicing educators, instructional designers and training specialists seek examples of innovative training and educational programs to enhance their ability to design effective learning experiences and develop different types of instructional materials and environments. We expect the Design and Development Showcase to play an important role in providing such examples.

Proposals must be sponsored by an AECT member, but do not have to be submitted by an AECT member. Awards will be given in three categories: (a) funded programs (>$100,000), (b) funded programs (<$100,000), and (c) unfunded programs. Other categories may be identified for recognition based on the number and variety of proposals.

The Design and Development Showcase will be open during regular session presentation times at the conference (exact day/time TBA). Authors of selected programs will have a table to display their materials and will be asked to prepare a poster describing key components of the program (e.g., goal/intent, target learners, foundations, design and development process, team members, cost, time). Authors will be expected to be present during specified times so conference participants may “Meet the Design & Development Team.”

Proposal Deadlines

Proposals Open – February 15, 2007
Proposals Close – March 15, 2007

How to Submit a Proposal

To be considered, a complete proposal must be submitted electronically no later than March 15, 2007. A complete online proposal submission consists of:

1. Program title and basic information
2. A short (fewer than 100 words) description
3. A 750-1000 word abstract that does not identify the specific presenter/s by name or content.
4. List of presenters (including sponsoring AECT member if the program is submitted by non AECT member).

To submit a proposal:

1. Read the Design and Development Showcase Submission Guidelines (listed below).
2. Prepare a proposal addressing the information requested in the guidelines.
3. Submit your proposal as an attachment to electronic mail and send it to the D&D Showcase Coordinator, Dr. Atsusi “2c” Hirumi, at hirumi@mail.ucf.edu.

After you submit your proposal, you will receive electronic notification that it has been received. The peer review process begins shortly after the submission deadline. This process is discussed in the next section.

Peer Review Process and Submission Guidelines

The Design and Development Division will convene its own panel of peer reviewers. This panel recommends which proposals should be accepted for the showcase. They will review and select proposals using the following criteria:

­ Clarity of proposal (how well it is written, including how well the program is described);
­ Strength and application of theoretical and/or empirical foundation(s);
­ Suitability for stated purpose of showcase and AECT membership;
­ Quality of the described program; and
­ Format, organization, and length.

Program Title and Basic Information. The title of the training or educational program should be clearly noted at the top of the proposal. Capitalize all words except the articles. Basic information about the program should be listed immediately after the title, including:

­ target learner population;
­ list of design and development team members, including primary responsibilities (e.g., instructional designer, programmer, graphic artist);
­ nature of program (e.g., self-instructional print, stand alone computer, totally online, hybrid, conventional instructor-led); and
­ funding/budget category (a) internal or externally funded program (budget >$100,000 for design and development), (b) internal or externally funded programs (budget <$100,000 for design and development), or (c) unfunded programs (e.g. programs designed for class with no budget for design and/or development).
Short Description (100 words). This summary should clearly indicate the content and scope of the program, giving the reader a good idea of who the program was designed for, the theoretical and empirical foundation of the program, and the process used to design and develop of the program. These descriptions will help convention attendees decide which “Meet the design and Development Team” sessions to attend, so the better they are, the more satisfied conference attendees will be.
Abstract. Include a 750 -1000 word abstract for your proposal that provides a more detailed treatment of the program, including: (a) the context in which the program was designed (e.g., for class, as part of a contract, based on a grant); (b) target learner population, (c) key program features (what makes it innovative?), (d) the specific theoretical and/or empirical foundation that guided the design and development of the program, (e) the process used to design and development the program; and (f) the resources used to design and develop the program (with testing and/evaluation data if available).
List of Presenters. Presenter’s Name - the name is used with no “Ph.D.” or other degrees included. Presenter’s Affiliation - no abbreviations may be used regarding universities and institutions. Be sure to include name of the AECT member sponsoring the presentation if the proposal is submitted by non AECT member. AECT must be able to contact your co-presenters; in order for us to do so, provide the co-presenters’ names, institutions, and e-mail addresses. Your co-presenters will receive confirmation by e-mail and must then indicate their acceptance. If they fail to do so, they will be dropped as co-presenters for your proposal.
Note: Equipment needs. Presenters are expected to bring any equipment necessary to demonstrate or otherwise showcase their training and/or educational program. Tables will be made available, along with access to electrical outlets if necessary.
To prepare an excellent proposal, be sure to use concise language. Be sure to spell out all acronyms and enclose the acronym in parentheses immediately after the first time the word(s) appear (the acronym can then be used in the rest of the proposal). Pay attention to the way you format your proposal. Use paragraph breaks, capital and lower case letters, standard fonts, and correct punctuation and mechanics. Be accurate. Proofread your narrative for correct spelling and eliminate typographical errors. Poorly presented proposals often do not find their way into the convention program, regardless of the worth of the content.

Notification of Review Outcome

The Design and Development Division will notify you whether your proposal has been accepted or rejected no later than April 15, 2007. If accepted, you will be required to complete an Acceptance/Verification Form acknowledging receipt of acceptance notification and verifying your commitment to showcase proposed program at AECT 2007 in Anaheim. You must register for the conference: presentations of presenters who have not registered by September 1, 2007, will be dropped, and their presentations deleted from any print and/or electronic documents related to the convention program.

Only the primary presenter will be notified of acceptance by convention planners. It is the responsibility of the key presenter to notify all other individuals involved in the presentation of the acceptance status of the proposal. It is also the responsibility of the key presenter to send confirmation and convention information to nonmembers participating in a session. If selected, the presentation must follow the original proposed topic and content accepted by the National Convention Program Planning Committee.

All presenters must obtain written permission to use copyrighted photos, music, and the like in their sessions. In addition, all presenters are expected to follow the AECT Code of Ethics found on the AECT Web site (http://www.aect.org/intranet/publications/ethics/index.html).

Types of Programs and Award Criteria

For the initial 2007 showcase, programs will be selected from and awards given in three basic categories: (a) funded training and educational programs (<$100,000), (b) funded training and educational programs (>$100,000), (c) unfunded training and educational programs. Authors of an outstanding program from each category receive a certificate and will be invited to highlight their work in TechTrends and the D&D Division website.

Additional categories (e.g., best game, best print-based instructor-led training materials, best multimedia production, best class project) may be defined based on submitted proposals with winners receiving printed certificates.

Programs will be reviewed by a panel convened by the Design and Development Division during the conference. The panel will use the following criteria to judge each program. Authors of accepted programs will be recognized at the D&D/RTD luncheon.

Each criteria will be rated using the following scale:
­ Exemplary: A model for best practice as related to specified criterion;
­ Accomplished: Good implementation of specified criterion; comparable to expectations in the field;
­ Promising: Attempt made to implement criteria, but may be incomplete or additional work is required;
­ Not Evident: Unable to find evidence of specified criteria;
­ Not Applicable: Criterion has little or no relevance to program.

Program Title:
Program Category (circle): Funded >$100,000 | Funded <$100,000 | Unfunded
Criteria Rating
Clearly identified goals and objectives are explicit or implicitly discernible from a review of the program
Instructional events and activities adhere to and are consistent with theoretical and/or empirical foundations
Assessment methods (formal or informal) are valid and aligned both to learning outcomes and to the context of learning
Media selection and representation of information are skillful and aligned with the context of learning
Purpose and value of tools and technology use is easily discernible
Production quality (visual, text, audio, animation, interaction and experience) is well balanced for efficiency and impact in the context of use
The program exhibits the results of innovative, imaginative and/or elegant design thinking
The program serves as an exemplar for other designers in one or more critical dimension
Utility of the program in its context (or proposed context) of use is evident